Menjadikan Pemilik Tanah Sebagai Pemegang Saham Perusahaan, Sebagai Alternatif Pembebasan Tanah Masyarakat

Donal Devi Amdanata, Noorhayati Mansor

Abstract


This study aims to produce a model of the transfer of control of land without any permanent transfer of land rights. Basic theory used is the stakeholder theory and combined with agency theory. At this time, the company issues in land acquisition is a problem that was never completed. Companies require mastery of the land to increase production and increase investment. Problems arise if the property is controlled by a corporation that wants to belong to the community. The Company typically acquires land by following standard procedures. Starting from the issue of legality to the pricing of land acquisition, while the community determines the price of land acquisition by using market prices. The problem is further complicated when people use the market price, but not based on the calculation of appraisal, but based on rumors or general discussions in the community. So that the area acquisition price is higher than taxable value. The model determined by making the owner of the land as one of the shareholders in the capital structure of the company, or the firm appoints affiliated companies. With this model, the public ownership of the land or the landowner has not changed, and the company can use the desired area without a lot of money and time spent for land acquisition.

Keywords


Stakeholder Theory, Agency Theory, Land Acquisition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alting, H. (2011). Konflik Penguasaan Tanah Di Maluku Utara: Rakyat Versus Penguasa Dan Pengusaha. Jurnal Konstitusi, II(2), 266–282.

Azima, A. M., Lyndon, N., Mastura, S. . S., Saad, S., & Awang, A. H. (2015). Orang Asli Semelai: Conflict of Defending Land Ownership Rights. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4S3), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p63

Berle, A. A., & Means, G. G. C. (1991). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Transaction Publishers.

Chan, N. (2003). Land Acquisition Compensation in China -Problems & Answers. International Real Estate Review, 6(1), 136–152.

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). a Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271994

Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 87–152.

Das, S. P., & Saha, A. (2015). Land acquisition and industrial growth. Indian Growth and Development Review, 8(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-06-2015-0025

Davis, J., & Thornley, A. (2010). Urban regeneration for the London 2012 Olympics: Issues of land acquisition and legacy. City, Culture and Society, 1(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2010.08.002

Dickinson, P. G. (2010). Foreign SMEs and land acquisition the reality of regulation (the case of Estonia). Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 9(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/14770021011029627

Edum-Fotwe, F. T., & Price, A. D. F. (2009). A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.003

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston: Pitman, 13.

Hamzah, J., Er, A. C., Haffiz Aliasak, M. H., Habibah, A., Buang, A., Hussain, M. Y., & Sivapalan, S. (2013). Development process and its implication on the native land ownership. Asian Social Science, 9(14 SPL), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n14p18

Lumantouw, A. C. (2016). Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012. Lex et Societatis, IV(5), 106–115.

Mahrudin. (2010). Konflik Kebijakan Pertambangan Antara Pemerintah dan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Buton. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 1(1), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2010.0011

Mudjiono. (2007). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Di Indonesia Melalui Revitalisasi Fungsi Badan Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum, 14(3), 458–473.

Sembiring, J. (2011). Tanah dalam perspektif filsafat ilmu hukum *. Mimbar Hukum, 23(2), 237–429.

Sudrajat, T. (2010). Aspirasi reformasi hukum dan penegakan hukum progresif melalui media hakim perdamaian desa. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(3), 291–300.

Wangke, T. N. (2016). Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, IV(4), 126–134.

Wiryani, F., & Najih, M. (2010). The Yuridic Problems of Regulate People’s Land Taking For The Construction On The Public Utility. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY.

Yunus, N. (2009). Konsep Pembaharuan Hukum Agraria Sesuai Amanat UUD 1945. Jurnal Legalitas, 2(51–60).

Zakie, M. (2011). Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum ( Perbandingan antara Malaysia dan Indonesia ) 1, 187–206.

SUMBER LAIN

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1960). Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 1960.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1999). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Undang Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2007). Perseroan Terbatas. Undang Undang No.40 Tahun 2007.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2012). Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Undang Undang No. 2 Tahun 2012.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1993). Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Keputusan Presiden No. 55 Tahun 1993.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2011). Pengelolaan, Pengkajian, dan Penanganan Kasus Pertanahan. Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.3 Tahun 2011.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v2i2.6197

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.