DETERMINASI ILMU HUKUM DI PANGGUNG JUS DICERE: SEBUAH TITIK AKHIR POTRET GENEOLOGIS DARI MEDAN PENGOLAHAN HUKUM PRAKTIS, INTRAYUDISIAL DAN EKSTRAYUDISIAL

Herman Bakir

Abstract


Abstract

This paper aims to theoretically describe a genealogical feature of science which because of itsown orientative profundity has received the awarding of the title of the legal theory as “the authentic legal science”, namely: science of law, especially by looking at the activities that this science has done in forums Jus Dicere. The method used in this descriptive effort is called normative-theoretical, while the starting point (approach) is a juridical-interdisciplinary way of looking of Legal Theory, especially while this theoretical discipline must theorize the genetic potential of science of law itself. The results of this study are: (a) Genetically, science of law is a science that can separate itself into the family of engineering sciences, and the genuine science of law at this belief is Legal Engineering; (b) Jus Dicere is a much wider area than Jus Dare, as a place where the science of law demonstrates all itsown potential, or expertises/skills as an engineering sciences and technology; (c) in this capacity, the science of law does not merely appear as a Technique of Legislative Drafting (Jus Dare); but also as an Technique of Investigation; Technique of Prosecution; Technique of Adjudication; Technique of Notaryship; Technique of Court Proceedings; Advocacy Techniques for Criminal Law Cases; etc (Jus Dicere). The theoretical explanations related to geneology, as well as the daily tasks of science of law are important, especially in relation to the development of the disciplinary paradigm of the science that we call the science of law. Finally, however, this paper wants to promise its readers a more convincing theoretical insight regarding the theoretical knowledge of science of law, whether it is at the state of inactive, or when it is in motion.

 

Keywords: The Science of Law, Family of Engineering Science, Legal Technique, The Stage of Jus Dicere

 

Abstrak

Artikel ini dimaksudkan untuk secara teoretis mendeskripsikan sebuah fitur geneologis dari ilmu yang karena kedalaman orientatifnya telah menerima penganugerahan Teori Hukum sebuah gelar sebagai “the authentic legal science”, yakni: Ilmu Hukum, terutama dengan memperhatikan kiprah ilmu disebutkan terakhir di forum-forum Jus Dicere. Metode dalam usaha deskriptif ini adalah normatif-teoretikal, sedangkan titik-tolaknya (pendekatannya) adalah cara melihat yang yuridis-interdisipliner dari Teori Hukum, terutama selagi disiplin ilmu teoretis ini harus berteori dengan sisi geneologis dari Ilmu Hukum itu sendiri. Hasil penelitian: (a) secara genetikal, llmu Hukum adalah ilmu yang mengelompokkan diri ke dalam keluarga ilmu-ilmu teknikal, dan oleh karenanya Ilmu Hukum yang sesungguhnya itu dengan bertolak dari keyakinan ini disebut “Teknik Hukum”; (b) Jus Dicere merupakan lahan yang jauh lebih luas di banding Jus Dare, tempat di mana Ilmu Hukum mendemonstrasikan segenap potensi, atau keahlian/keterampilan teknisnya sebagai suatu ilmu yang mandiri secara disipliner; (c) dalam terminologi ini (Teknik Hukum), llmu Hukum tidak sekedar tampil sebagai Teknik Perundang-undangan (Jus Dare); tapi juga sebagai Teknik Penyidikan; Teknik Penuntutan; Teknik Kehakiman; Teknik Kenotariatan; Teknik Beracara; Teknik Advokasi; dan lain sebagainya (Jus Dicere). Akhirnya, bagaimanapun tulisan ini ingin menghadirkan kepada pembacanya sebuah wawasan teoretis yang lebih meyakinkan terkait pengetahuan-pengetahuan teoretis tentang Ilmu Hukum, baik saat diam, ataupun saat bergerak.

 

Kata Kunci: Ilmu Hukum, Keluarga Ilmu Teknikal, Teknik Hukum, Panggung Jus Dicere


Keywords


The Science of Law, Family of Engineering Science, Legal Technique, The Stage of Jus Dicere

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, John dan Sarah Austin, 1873, Lectures of Jurisprudence: Or, The Philosophy of Positive Law, Spottiswood & Co, London.

Bakir, Herman, 2006, Kastil Teori Hukum, Gramedia, Jakarta.

_______, 2007, Filsafat Hukum: Desain dan Arsitektur Kesejarahan, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

_______, 2015, Filsafat Hukum: Tema-tema Fundamental Keadilan dari Sisi Ajaran Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

_______, 2018, Etika Profesi Hukum: Pagutan, Kredo, Palu Kristal Hakim-Hakim Neo-Atlantis, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Berg, David, 2003, The Trial Lawyer: What it Takes to Win. Chicago, American Bar Association Publishing, Illinois.

Borda, Aldo Zammit, 2011, Legislative Drafting, Routledge Publishing, London.

Bouvier, Door John, 1877, A Law Dictionary: Adapted to The Constitution and Laws of the United States of America, Volume 1, Lippincot & Co, Philadelphia.

Budiarjo, Miriam, 2003, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Caudli, David S, 2011, Stories About Science in Law: Literary, and Historical Images of Acquired Expertise, Routledge, London.

Debaene, Stijn, Raf van Kuyck, dan Bea Van Buggenhout, “Legislative Technique as Basis of Legislative Drafting System”, Jurnal, dalam H. Jaap van den Herik et al. (eds), Legal Knowledge Based Systems, JURIX 1999, Konferensi XII, Nijmegen, GNI, 1999.

Dupret, Baudouin, 2011, Adjudication in Action: An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality & Justice, Alih Bahasa oleh Pascale Ghazaleh, Ashgate Publishing, Surrey.

Garner, Bryan A., 1999, Black’s Law Dictionary, West Group Publishing, St. Paul Minnesota.

_______, 2009, Black’s Law Dictionary, Edition 9, West Group Publishing, St. Paul Minnesota.

Ghafar, Afan, et. al., 1996, Merebut Masa Depan: Sambutan Pembuka, Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Amanah Putra Nusantara, Jakarta.

Goodrich, Peter, 2017, “Rethoric and Law”, dalam Michael J. MacDonald, The Oxford Handbook of Rethorical Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Grenfell, Laura, 2013, Promoting the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Gunarto, Dedi, 2015, Panduan Lengkap Tes TNI POLRI: Modul Materi Terlengkap, Penerbit Bintang Wahyu, Jakarta.

Hazard, Geoffrey C, dan Angelo Dondi, 2004, Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

Hoecke, Mark van, dan Arendt Soeteman, “Legal Philosophie in The Low Countries”, dalam Enrico Pattaro, Corrado Roversi, A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, Volume 12, tahun 2016, Legal Philosophy in Twentieth Century, The Civil Law World, Springer Publisher, Dordrecht.

Jahja, Juni Sjafrien, 2013, Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Memberantas Koruptif pada Pemerintahan & Korporasi, Penerbit Visimedia, Jakarta.

Kelsen, Hans, 2005, Pure Theory of Law, Alih Bahasa ke dalam Bahasa Inggris oleh Max Knight. Clark, The Lawbook Exchange, New Jersey.

Kennedy, Duncan Leroy, 1958, Bill Drafting, West Publishing, Co, Minesota.

Kreitner, Roy, 2013, “The Character of Legal Theory”, dalam Dagan, Hanoch, Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kuhn, Thomas S, 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Levy, Beryl H, 2000, Cardozo and Frontiers of Legal Thinking: With Selected Opinion, BeardBooks Publishing, Washington D.C.

Malanczuk, Peter, 1993, Humanitarian Intervention and the Legitimacy of the Use of Force, Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam.

Margolis, Joseph, 1993, The Flux of History & The Flux of Science, University of California Press, Barkeley, LA.

O’Mahoney, Joe, dan Calvert Markham, 2013, Management Consultancy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Putra, Anom Surya, “Manifesto Hukum Kritis: Teori Hukum Kritis, Dogmatika dan Praktik Hukum”, Jurnal Wacana: Gerakan Transformasi Sosial, Edisi 2, Tahun II, 2000.

Santoso, Topo, et. al, 2011, Panduan Investigasi dan Penuntutan dengan Pendekatan Hukum Terpadu, Penerbit CIFOR, Bogor.

Sheppard, Sheri, et. al., “What is Engineering Practice”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 22, Nomor 3, Tahun 2006.

Wintgens, Luc J., 2002, Legisprudence: A New Theoretical Approach to Legislation: Proceedings of The Fourth Benelux-Scandinavian Symposum of Legal Theory, Hart Publising, Oxford.

Xanthaki, Helen, 2014, Drafting Legislation: Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation, Bloomsburry Publishing, London.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i1.6745

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.