A STUDY ON THE ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP N 18 PEKANBARU IN COMPREHENDING PROCEDURE TEXTS
Abstract
The objective of this study is to find out the ability of thesecond year students of SMP N 18 Pekanbaru in comprehendingprocedure texts. Based on the result of the data analysis in chapter IV,the writer makes some conclusions. Among 40 students, no studentis in excellent level and very poor level, 13 students (32.5%) are ingood level, 25 students (62.5%) are in mediocre level, 2 students (5%)are in poor level. The mean score of the whole students incomprehending procedure texts is 57.81. In conclusion, the ability ofthe second year students of SMP N 18 Pekanbaru in comprehendingprocedure texts is at mediocre level. Since the research dealt withcomprehending procedure texts, the writer drew conclusions for eachclassification of comprehending procedure texts. In terms of findingmain idea, from 40 students, 5 students (12.5%) are in excellent level,24 students (60%) are in good level, 3 students (7.5%) are inmediocre level, 7 students (17.5%) are in poor level and 1 student(2.5%) is in very poor level. In terms of finding factual information, 4students (10%) are in excellent level, 24 students (60.%) are in goodlevel, 8 students (20%) are in mediocre level, 3 students (7.5%) are inpoor level and 1 student (2,5%) is in very poor level. In terms offinding meaning of difficult word, 6 students (15%) are in excellentlevel, 21 students (52,5%) are in good level, 10 students (25%) are inmediocre level, 2 students (5%) are in poor level and 1 students(2.5%) is in verypoor level. In terms of identifying reference, nostudent (0%) is in excellent level, 11 students (27.5%) are in goodlevel, 13 students (32.5%) are in mediocre level, 14 students (35%) arein poor level and 2 students (5%) are in very poor level. In terms ofmaking restatement, from 2 students (5%) are inexcellentlevel, 10students (25%) are in good level, 12 students (30%) are in mediocrelevel, 16 students (40%) are in poor level and no student (0%) is invery poor level.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azhar, Fadly.2004. Pedoman Penyusunandan Penyelenggaraan Ujian Skripsi di Prodi Bahasa Inggris Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni FKIP- UNRI.Pekanbaru: Faculty of Teachers’ Training and Education.(Unpublished)
Burnes, Don. 1985. Insights and Strategy for Teaching Reading. Australia: National Library of Australia Cataloguing – in – Publication Data.
Buss, Kathleen et al. 2004. Reading and Writing Nonfiction Genres. International Reading Association, Inc.
Carrel et al 1998. Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge University Press. United States of America.
Departement Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Standard Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum, Balitbang Depdiknas.
Derewianka, Baverly. 2001. Using Functional Exploring how to work. Australia: National Library.
Djuharie, OtongSetiawan. 2007. Genre. Bandung: YramaWidya.
Gay, L.R. 2000.Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Malaysia: Longman.
Hartono, Rudi. 2005. Genre of texts. Faculty of Language and Art. Universitas Semarang.
Hatch, E and Farhady, H. 1982.Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistic. Los Angeles: University of California.
Heaton, J.B. 1975. A Practical Guide for Teacher of English as a Second or Foreign Language. London: Longman.
Heinemann, Rifby. 2004. Writing Resource Book. Australia: Advance Press.
Hong, Zhi. 2007. The Effect of Learning Strategies on Reading Comprehension. Retrieved February 2, 2010 from, http://www.lingust.org.cn/doc/su200704/su20070404.pdf
Hornby, A.S. 2000.Oxford Advance Learners’ Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Nuttal, Christine. 1982. Teaching English in Foreign Language. Great Britain: The Bath Press
Sofyan, Fahmi. 2008. KiatSukses Lulus UjianBahasaInggris. Jakarta: Pustaka TarbiyahBaru
Stanley, M and King 2004.Building Skill for TOEFL, BinaAksara, Jakarta
Sudjana. 1998. MetodeStatika. Bandung: Penerbit Tarsito.
Wayan and Sumartana. 1986. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Penerbit Usaha Nasional
http://www.wikipedia. “Reading Comprehension” 2 February 2010
http://www.wikipedia. ”Procedure Text” 2 February 2010
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/sorot.8.1.2348
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2013 Ervina Nova Purba, Effendi Gultom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal ini terdaftar dan terindeks pada: