PANCASILA DAN IDENTITAS KE-INDONESIA-AN: Sebuah Catatan Krisis

Muchid Albintani

Abstract


The term there is no legislation under development of Pancasila as the basis of the state, but the
position of Pancasila is unshakeable. The anti-Pancasila attitude must also be anti-diversity that
can live as a nation and a state [national crises]. Without affirmation or not in the
legislation, Pancasila is the ‘foundation and ideology of the state’. Based on the fact that there
is irrelevant when the question arises, whether Pancasila is still needed as the basis of state and
nation, or is Pancasila still needed as a source of national law that explicitly needs to be
affirmed into the
1945 Constitution and the sanctions of Pancasila tabulatively? This paper is an assertion of
[reinforcement] of the Pencasila as an ideology into the 1945 Constitution or not,
highly dependent on the winning electoral regime and the ‘election-winning political party’.
Pancasila as ‘the foundation and ideology of the state’ becomes the determinant of ‘as close as the
regime of the results of the practice of direct democracy’. Therefore, the affirmation of the
essentials in building a lasting and harmonious life of fellow children of the nation in the
future. Recognizing the reintroduction of the Indonesia’s identity of essence of Pancasila as the
ideology of nation and state is based on ‘national consensus’. This awareness is resilient, so that
a country that has been established for more than 73 years does not experience an identity crisis.

 


Keywords


Pancasila, Intelligence, Identity Crisis and Indonesia’s

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35967/jipn.v16i28.5825

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.